Category Archives: scientific misconduct

A review of two new books that attack the DSM-5, psychiatry’s “bible”

Share I reviewed two books now circulating about the DSM and the current controversy over the DSM-5 for The American Scholar — see review here. The two books are The Book of Woe: The DSM and the Unmaking of Psychiatry by … Continue reading

Posted in antidepressants, antipsychotic drugs, conflicts of interest, drug marketing, FDA, pharmaceutical industry, prescription drug abuse, scientific misconduct | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Martin Keller, principal investigator of Paxil study 329, retires from Brown University

Share I just learned that Dr. Martin Keller, principal investigator of the controversial Paxil study 329, has retired from his position as a professor of psychiatry at Brown University — see here. As Pharmalot notes, Keller quietly retired June 30 in … Continue reading

Posted in antidepressants, clinical trials, conflicts of interest, drug marketing, ghostwriting, pharmaceutical industry, scientific journal retractions, scientific misconduct | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments

Calls for action against authors of controversial Paxil study are getting louder

Share In the wake of GlaxoSmithKline’s record-breaking $3 billion settlement with the U.S. Department of Justice, a number of psychiatrists and researchers have redoubled their efforts to get Paxil study 329 retracted. As mentioned here and in other news accounts, the … Continue reading

Posted in antidepressants, clinical trials, conflicts of interest, drug marketing, ghostwriting, National Institutes of Health, pharmaceutical industry, scientific journal retractions, scientific misconduct, university industry collaboration | Tagged , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Why academic researchers involved in fraudulent Paxil study escape scrutiny

Share The Chronicle of Higher Education this week ponders why various universities have taken no action against the academic researchers who co-authored the notorious Paxil study that formed the crux of GlaxoSmithKline’s recent $3 billion settlement with the Department of … Continue reading

Posted in antidepressants, clinical trials, National Institutes of Health, pharmaceutical industry, scientific journal retractions, scientific misconduct, university industry collaboration | Tagged , , , , , | 3 Comments

New York AG’s office should take a bow for GlaxoSmithKline’s record-breaking fine

Share I was glad to see that the New York Times‘ reporters covering GlaxoSmithKline’s $3 billion settlement tipped their hat to former New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer. After all, it was his crew and specifically a pioneering attorney by … Continue reading

Posted in antidepressants, antipsychotic drugs, clinical trials, drug marketing, patient care, pharmaceutical industry, scientific journal retractions, scientific misconduct, suicide rates, whistleblowing | Tagged , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Is the FDA violating its own mandate to approve safe drugs?

Share Is the Food and Drug Administration violating its own mandate to approve safe drugs? That was the question that Donald Light, co-author of The Risk for Prescription Drugs and a long-time medical sociologist, posed at a talk yesterday at … Continue reading

Posted in antidepressants, biotech industry, clinical trials, continuing medical education, drug marketing, FDA, health care costs, medical devices, patient care, pharmaceutical industry, scientific misconduct, suicide rates, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

How drug companies continue to hide the true story of Tamiflu and other drugs from the American public

Share I’ve been reading Dr. David Healy’s new book, Pharmageddon, and while some of it may seem like old news, I was struck by his fresh analysis of how the pharmaceutical industry has turned the original purpose of clinical trials … Continue reading

Posted in antidepressants, antipsychotic drugs, clinical trials, drug marketing, FDA, health care costs, patient care, pharmaceutical industry, scientific misconduct | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

When it comes to scientific misconduct, should there be a statute of limitations?

Share I was hesitant to weigh in at first when I learned that Brown University’s School of Medicine had decided not to pressure a psychiatric journal to retract the seriously flawed Paxil study that I wrote about in Side Effects. … Continue reading

Posted in antidepressants, clinical trials, conflicts of interest, FDA, ghostwriting, pharmaceutical industry, scientific journal retractions, scientific misconduct | 7 Comments

International group seeks Brown University’s help in retracting controversial Paxil study

Share The international research organization Healthy Skepticism has called on Brown University to help convince a psychiatric journal to retract the controversial Paxil trial that I wrote about in Side Effects, according to the Brown Daily Herald. The principal investigator … Continue reading

Posted in antidepressants, conflicts of interest, drug marketing, ghostwriting, pharmaceutical industry, scientific journal retractions, scientific misconduct | Tagged , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Allegations of fraud and extensive ghostwriting form core of upcoming Texas case against Johnson & Johnson

Share On November 28, the Texas Attorney General is expected to begin a landmark trial against Johnson & Johnson on charges that the pharmaceutical giant “subverted scientific integrity” by paying off academic psychiatrists and state officials to boost the use … Continue reading

Posted in antipsychotic drugs, conflicts of interest, drug marketing, ghostwriting, patient care, pharmaceutical industry, scientific misconduct, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 6 Comments