- This blog is a discussion about our system of public and private health care.
-

Blogroll
About Me
Alison Bass is a Pulitzer Prize nominee and author of Side Effects: A Prosecutor, a Whistleblower and a Bestselling Antidepressant on Trial, which won the NASW Science in Society Award. She was a longtime medical and science writer for The Boston Globe and has also written for The Miami Herald, Psychology Today and MIT's Technology Review, among other publications. A series she wrote for The Boston Globe on psychiatry was nominated for a Pulitzer Prize and she has received many other journalism awards. In 2007, she won a prestigious Alicia Patterson Fellowship to write Side Effects. Bass teaches journalism at Mount Holyoke College and Brandeis University.Blog Archive
- February 2013 (1)
- November 2012 (1)
- October 2012 (1)
- September 2012 (4)
- August 2012 (1)
- July 2012 (2)
- June 2012 (3)
- May 2012 (3)
- April 2012 (2)
- February 2012 (2)
- January 2012 (3)
- December 2011 (3)
- November 2011 (3)
- October 2011 (2)
- September 2011 (4)
- August 2011 (3)
- July 2011 (3)
- June 2011 (4)
- May 2011 (4)
- April 2011 (3)
- March 2011 (3)
- February 2011 (3)
- January 2011 (4)
- December 2010 (3)
- November 2010 (2)
- September 2010 (2)
- July 2010 (1)
- May 2010 (1)
- April 2010 (1)
- March 2010 (3)
- February 2010 (3)
- January 2010 (4)
- December 2009 (4)
- November 2009 (5)
- October 2009 (4)
- September 2009 (6)
- August 2009 (7)
- July 2009 (4)
- June 2009 (5)
- May 2009 (4)
- April 2009 (7)
- March 2009 (4)
- February 2009 (3)
- January 2009 (4)
- December 2008 (4)
- November 2008 (3)
- October 2008 (4)
- September 2008 (5)
- August 2008 (2)
- July 2008 (6)
- June 2008 (5)
- May 2008 (1)
- April 2008 (1)
Category Archives: university industry collaboration
Plot twists in Soderbergh’s new movie Side Effects strain belief
Share I went to see Steven Soderbergh’s new film, Side Effects, with anticipation and dread. The movie, after all, carries the same name as my 2008 book, Side Effects and from what I could tell of the trailers, its plot … Continue reading
Calls for action against authors of controversial Paxil study are getting louder
Share In the wake of GlaxoSmithKline’s record-breaking $3 billion settlement with the U.S. Department of Justice, a number of psychiatrists and researchers have redoubled their efforts to get Paxil study 329 retracted. As mentioned here and in other news accounts, the … Continue reading
Posted in antidepressants, clinical trials, conflicts of interest, drug marketing, ghostwriting, National Institutes of Health, pharmaceutical industry, scientific journal retractions, scientific misconduct, university industry collaboration
Tagged antidepressants, Brown University, Department of Justice, GlaxoSmithKline, Health Care Renewal, Martin Keller, oneboringoldman, Paxil
2 Comments
Why academic researchers involved in fraudulent Paxil study escape scrutiny
Share The Chronicle of Higher Education this week ponders why various universities have taken no action against the academic researchers who co-authored the notorious Paxil study that formed the crux of GlaxoSmithKline’s recent $3 billion settlement with the Department of … Continue reading
Posted in antidepressants, clinical trials, National Institutes of Health, pharmaceutical industry, scientific journal retractions, scientific misconduct, university industry collaboration
Tagged Brown University, Chronicle of Higher Education, Department of Justice, GlaxoSmithKline, Martin Keller, Paxil
3 Comments
Enforcing anti-kickback laws: a powerful deterrent against ghost-writing in medicine
Share The Obama administration recently made it clear that it will require drug companies to disclose the payments they make to doctors for research, consulting, speaking, travel and entertainment under the new health care law — see the New York … Continue reading
Posted in antidepressants, conflicts of interest, continuing medical education, drug marketing, ghostwriting, pharmaceutical industry, university industry collaboration
Tagged anti-kick statutes, conflicts of interest in medicine, Congress, continuing medical education, corruption, drug and medical device companies
Leave a comment
New drug industry partnership with hospitals could jeopardize patient care
Share We’ve all signed those vague privacy statements when visiting our local hospital for medical care. But how many of us have actually read the fine print and understand that the most sensitive details of our medical lives may be … Continue reading
Taxpayers lose out in Supreme Court ruling on who owns federally funded research
Share The current issue of the New England Journal of Medicine contains a thoughtful essay about who owns federally funded research: the universities who receive the funding or the private companies who contract with academic researchers to develop a specific … Continue reading
French lawmakers may mandate conflict of interest disclosures
Share At a time when our own government has stepped back from requiring true transparency about conflicts of interest in medicine, French lawmakers seem to be heading in a much bolder direction. According to Nature Medicine, the French national assembly … Continue reading
New NIH rules about conflicts of interest are a swiss cheese of loopholes
Share The newly announced rules on financial conflicts of interest among federally funded researchers are certainly an improvement on the existing regulations issued by the National Institutes of Health in 1995 (which were never enforced anyway). But as ethicists and … Continue reading
What’s behind the growing rate of scientific retractions?
Share The retraction of studies in medical and scientific journals has surged in the last decade, according to separate analyses done by the Wall Street Journal and Retraction Watch. In its page-one article today, the Journal noted that while just … Continue reading
With Big Pharma on campus, who is looking after the public interest?
Share Medicare and social services for vulnerable Americans are not the only programs on the chopping block with Washington’s deal to raise the debt ceiling and cut trillions of dollars in government spending. Looming ahead may be deep cuts in … Continue reading